Відео

11. 5., 10:29 Заступник голови РНБО і екс-президент Росії Дмитро Медведєв пригрозив Франції і Британії ударами по їхніх мегаполісах не тільки звичайною зброєю, але і "спеціальними боєприпасами". За його словами, Москва зробила б це у випадку, якщо Україна зі своєї території завдасть удару по Росії французькими і британськими ракетами. Цей козел погрожує? Міжнародний терорист має бути покараний.

AYUSH STEPHEN TOPPO IS SO CUTEE....

I see this gentrification issue has become worldwide in the 21st century

Wish you a good health and for arties Artie's professor processor Scienziati medici e parti del mondo per istruire le università internazionali

Putting Russian imperialism back in the bottle is priority number one because if the world trading order falls apart because they engage in a land war to retake Europe then you will be poor in your future. A close second is reigning in militant Islam, particularly Iran and its proxies. As these two issues are so closely connected I count them as a single issue. China will expand it's sphere of influence but they are more interested in maintaining world order so they are more competition rather than an existential threat to Western democracy which both of the other two protagonists have as their only goal. None of the other goals such as mitigating climate change, reducing poverty, increasing women's and LGBTQ emancipation will happen if this primary issue is not dealt with first. Replacing Hamas with someone more interested in the well being of Gazan's and pushing Russian troops out of Ukraine are therefore the political issue of the day.

The way taxpayers pay is by 1) being out of a job longer. 2) reducing pay when going back in.

So basically come to LSE for all your Left-wing indoctrination needs.

Freedom without constraints is counterproductive! I will give another example to illustrate what Pr. Joseph Stiglitz wants to explain very well here: imagine that a conductor of his automobile on a perfect road in the sense that no friction and thereby no force of resistance, the surface's road will apply to his automobile weels . The result will be that these weels will patina and the automobile will not be able to go nowhere...and stick in its initial position Best regards M.Ali From Marrakech

Great

Starts 5:30

Impressive

Where is the actual talk? It starts with questions...

Beyon socialism and caoutalism is simoly imperialism

The possibility of meaningful change through establishment politics, that's been lost, imo.

I am a non party voter. Two party system must go. DNC and RNC only represents 1/4 of the country yet they rule our Nation. The current Primary set up and the ability of the main party can block out any non party threats. Changing the rule to favor there party and block any threat to there controll.

Very nicely done. Can the PowerPoint slide decks be found online?

How about showing us the rape crisis center resources that are non existent? LSE protects rapists and sexual misconduct perps.

LSE: the feel good education place for white males who engage in rape and sexual misconduct. The institution will have your back.

Any scholarships for Pakistani postgraduate students

This book should be categorized as fiction. China is 0 5 to 1.0 roght now. They look at this woman's ideas as cute and fantastical.

No matter what, there always seems to be a sound problem.

1:08:56 Not that I want to hate on people, but I'm in disbelief as to how people with such speech problems might not have them fixed before going out to speak publicly. As far as I know, therapy for stuttering is neither hard nor unaffordable.

How about having a rape reporting procedure that works? And now having KPMG audit rape procedures when they have zero experience with rape reporting? Why did the LSE not bring in an Eric Holder type to clean house? That would do miracles for mental health.

Here is another tip: don’t get raped at the LSE. The administration will try to bury you in concrete moments Mafia style. If you are a woman of colour against a lily white man there, another point against you.

Can we talk about how the LSE slut shames victims of sexual assault? In particular, the administration has a strong distaste for international students who experience rape or sexual harassment?

How about hands off LSE? Stop slut shaming victims. That might require having a heart in the first place.

Until science and technology is reigned in it’s of no use speaking of human rights

Like this content!

One of the best universities in the world, and both here and their audio podcasts cannot figure out how to manage sound, in this case, either the viewer couldn't hear the questions or Stiglitz couldn't hear them. It's baffling how such an institution can be so poor at something rather simple.

great video

Well syndicate project..🎉for your book ..a little I listening ..I try to understand what's different from other book ..you said ..do what *you* likes to do ..and then we are free..les self fishing....thx

"We need to get the rich to sell their asset otherwise the poor will never get to buy those asset". This sounds like the mentality of someone who is poor. We should be focusing to increase the size of the economy/pie instead of fighting one another for the same pie.

Really excellent interviewing from Rebecca Gowland here. Having listened to the audiobook, and it's interesting she brought up Harry Sanbi(?) - Harry just missed his Mum, a lot. I hope in the 8 years that passed between he and Gary parting ways, his life improved.

I was hoping that Professor Stiglitz would have addressed Fractional Reserve Banking, which to my mind, is a major reason capitalism has gone bad. On top of that the Feds take it upon themselves, a few wise people there, to FIX the PRICE of debt. My humble suggestion, go to full reserve banking and stop fixing prices.

The guy is a disgusting socialist

One thing he´s wrong about is that the BBC is still very biased. It´s biased in terms of viewpoint, it tends to promote establishment views and it´s also biased in terms of the kind of people it recruits.

embarrassing neo Marxist confusion about reality. facts contradict every pronouncement of Stigliz. Progressivism rings that unpleasant bell of eugenics. really shameful. Sweden has low taxes and through and through capitalist structure of the economy. I was wondering who is the audience professor Stigliz was addressing. oh well, LSE is not what it used to be, apparently

Think our emotions come in the way of determining morality in the definition of a good society. We also should not assume things about what other eminent economists might have meant in what they had written or said. In this regard, Friedman did say that businesses should try to maximize profits for shareholders, but don’t think he meant profit maximization is to be achieved at the expense of ethics. He always maintained that ethics is the responsibility of the individual(s) in question. Now on to your examples. First and foremost, taking away 100 or 200 billion USD from Bezos is not going to motivate many who need to be more responsible for their lives. Why should they try to earn more if someone’s going to take away a big chunk of it. Secondly, redistributing the 100 billion USD across people with low incomes is just not going to make them better off either. Temporarily, we may alleviate some of their challenges. Plenty of examples demonstrate that people being helped financially still end up in completely different economic circumstances after some years. Not sure we can go into someones’s mind and change it for that person. Long and short, Milton Friedman was by far and away a person full of morals and very unassuming. It’s presumptuous of Professor Stiglitz to make distinctions in capitalism such as progressive (which he claims is his way) and unfettered (which he claims is Friedman’s). Nonsense at best. There is only one kind. It is that which arises when the individual in the society is given importance and, more importantly, the individual is allowed a sense of freedom that allows the individual to not only think and act freely, but do so with a great deal of responsibility and compassion. Friedman has made a particular reference to the 2008 banking collapse, calling it the work of Clinton who in the name of helping out the poorer sections of American society looked the other way when bankers were selling mortgages to clients who had no means of paying back the banks at all. Friedman disapproved of what Clinton did. It was by no means according to Friedman an act of compassion or anything to do with the freedom of the individual, when bankers completely deprived clients of the opportunity to think freely and realize the amount of liability on themselves these mortgages would bring. The bankers achieved this by robbing off clients with all sorts of half-baked convoluted logic presented with products such as interest-free or decreasing-principal mortgages. I cannot imagine a Nobel Laureate such as Professor Stiglitz would go to such lengths as to create in his audience a sense of remorse or guilt by painting the corporate governance laws of the 1970’s (that ensured businesses were obligated to maximize value for their shareholders) as evil. How different is the situation of shareholders providing corporates with shareholder money any different from banks providing loans to regular people like Professor Stiglitz or any of us? Would Professor Stiglitz in the same vein say it is not correct for people who have taken loans to focus on paying back the banks first as best as possible before spending away on other things they liked? What kind of convoluted logic and a sense or responsibility is Professor Stiglitz preaching? You cannot have a diff sense of morality or responsibility just because a plan-borrowing individual is replaced with a shareholder money borrowing corporate entity. It is the responsibility of either to ensure that the entities (banks or shareholders) from whom they borrowed money are given full attention first.

if the governments can't solve poverty, homelessness, housing, healthcare, education, crime; if all these things are getting worse, why should a government get money to control the whole economy and make candies? governments need money to solve poverty, homelessness, housing, healthcare, education and crime before they start inventing new gizmos. in fact, the stagnating west is more weighed down by the government than the rising east. the east is more free enterprise oriented.

problems with the leftists: 1. charity (altruism) and voluntary action help to solve all problems 2. people trust each other and do not kill each other without any safeguards and laws 3. human nature is not largely selfish; there is no invisible hand this is disproven by the current anarchic world order without government: - foreign aid is much less than 1% of a country's gdp, - people just sit on the fence and watch crimes in palestine, rwanda, myanmar. - you need a draft to get soldiers to fight in a war. - rich people pay very little of their wealth and incomes in charity; philantropy doesn't work. - merciless debt collection by IMF in other words, you need cameras, police, laws, taxation, judicial systems to coerce individuals to behave nicely and justly and make a society work.

Climate change = the new boogie man of the left. That isn't to say that climate change isn't real, but the rise in climate alarmism is undeniable

Clearly a marxist ideologue. Not in synch with times. How can he explain to the people who have dutifully paid taxes over the last 3-4 decades only to see how their money goes to financing wars and not infrastructure, or education, or healthcare ?!? How can he still advocate the covid vaccine when the scandal of the huge excess unexplained deaths in the young adults is in full bloom ?!? Just throwing the blame on the very rich does not solve current problems. Truth is.....people need more action and less words....

Hello, thanks for the informative video. I’m looking into applying for a masters and also have a demanding full time job. You mentioned that you need to be on campus twice a week. Can you please clarify how much time you spend there each day? Is it for the duration of the lecture? My work has flexible working but would like to be clear on how much time I can expect to be focusing on studying during working hours. Thanks!

nobody is interested in studying in londonistan

Wonderful to bring these critical thinkers and their ideas to a wider public audience. Lets work together to develop the more open, critical university.

World famous poet Sir Derek Walcott, was a famous St Lucian, who was awarded the Noble Prize for Literature.

Sit Arthur Lewis was a St Lucian So proud of this distinguished St Lucian, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Economics.

St Lucia is a tiny island in the Caribbean measuring 238 square miles. St Lucia has a population of 180,000 Sir Arthur Lewis was born in St Lucia

Such a brilliant man. So proud he was a distinguished and World renowned , St Lucian economist. He attained a number of firsts Am sure he experienced racism in those days. Wow , such a distinguished St Lucian. So proud!

Economics science exists for the good of society but not necessarily give freedom but the hard reality of existentialism.